brazil – 360TT Blog

What If Table Tennis in Brazil Had the USATT Rating System?

Sun, 07 Jun 2026 22:40:00 -0300

If you play table tennis tournaments in Brazil, you have surely heard — or taken part in — a heated debate about the real level of the players. Who hasn’t seen someone entered in a theoretically lower category surprise everyone and take the title, while players from different states find huge technical gaps even though they sit in the same division?

In Brazil, the technical organization of our sport is dictated by the CBTM (the Brazilian Table Tennis Confederation) Manual, which structures the National Rating into static letter “drawers”. But on the North American circuit, the culture is completely different thanks to the USATT (USA Table Tennis) model. There, players don’t say they play in “Absolute C” or “Bronze Series”; they proudly introduce themselves with their exact number. You simply hear: “Nice to meet you, I’m a 1650 player” or “I’m training to break 1900”.

As a coach, I like to analyze systems that drive improvement. So let me invite you to think: what would happen if Brazil adopted a “living score” system like the American one?

In the United States, the rating is not just a label on a piece of paper; it dictates who you train with, which tables you can challenge at the club, and it defines your progress point by point.

TL;DR: in Brazil, the CBTM rating uses letters and fixed point bands, and a tournament’s weight counts for more than consistency. In the USATT model, the rating is a number that changes with every match: an upset earns many points and a favorite who wins earns none. A living score like that would give players a clear improvement goal, like a golf handicap. But whatever the system, the players who improve are the ones who train and study the game.

The current picture: how rating works in Brazil (CBTM 2026)

To draw a fair parallel, we first need to understand our current system precisely. The official CBTM regulation organizes players by technical level through fixed point bands. For men, for example, Rating A covers anyone with 3,300 points or more, Rating B runs from 2,800 to 3,299, going down the alphabet until Rating O, for those with up to 250 points.

When singles matches take place at official events on the national calendar — such as the Winter National Championship, the Summer National Championship, or the stages of the Brazil Cup Gold Series and Silver Series — the points you win or lose are calculated from a fixed table of “Expected Wins” (when the favorite wins) and “Unexpected Wins/Losses” (when the famous upset happens).

The core of our model is that the points earned in the basic table are always multiplied by the political and technical weight of the event. It works like this:

Winter National / Summer National: Weight 18.
National Selection: Weight 12.
Brazil Cup Gold Series: Weight 9.
Brazil Cup Silver Series: Weight 6.
State events: Weight 3.
Regional tournaments / Leagues: Weight 1.

Although this model protects the institutional importance of the big tournaments, it has a side effect: a player’s ranking depends heavily on how many expensive trips they can afford to play high-weight events (like a weight-18 Summer National), and less on their day-to-day consistency against the players in their own region.

The USATT model: the living-score algorithm

In the United States, the system removes the letters and the political weights of tournaments. The rating is a continuous, floating number (usually from 100 to 2900+). The calculation runs on a pure points-exchange algorithm based only on the mathematical difference (the so-called differential) between the two opponents before the match starts.

If a 1400-point player faces a 1410-point player, the difference is small and the match yields few points to the winner. But the real engine of American engagement is the upsets. If a focused, fast-improving 1400-point player surprises and beats an experienced 2000-point opponent, the algorithm punishes the favorite and injects a massive 50 points at once into the underdog’s pocket. On the other hand, if the 2000-point favorite wins, they gain exactly zero points, because the system understands that victory was merely a statistical obligation.

The psychological impact: a more logical line of progression

The great advantage of a dynamic, unified score in Brazil would be its direct impact on player motivation, especially for beginners and intermediate players. Instead of being stuck behind category barriers that depend on how many people entered on the day of the tournament, the player gets a clear, continuous individual line of progression.

The focus stops being purely a medal in a circumstantial knockout bracket and becomes a measurable improvement goal. The sport gains a sense of progress much like online game rankings or golf handicaps: you know exactly where you stand on the national table tennis map and how much you need to improve to reach the next step. Your opponent stops being just an unknown rival and also becomes a clear mathematical challenge.

Whatever the system, progress happens at the table

Of course, a change of this magnitude would bring gigantic logistical challenges for the CBTM to manage in a country of continental size like Brazil. But while the political backstage debates formulas, spreadsheets and tournament weights, the hard reality of table tennis stays the same everywhere in the world: whoever doesn’t train seriously and doesn’t study the game stays stuck.

In the end, whether you are counting the little letters of a static rating or climbing numbers in a living algorithm, the only real way to improve is to stay focused on refining your movements and sharpening your tactics.

We want to hear from you!

Now the table is yours: do you prefer the current CBTM system, based on well-defined letter bands (divisions) and weights by championship importance, or do you think a living-score algorithm like USATT’s would bring more fairness and motivation to Brazil’s amateur players? Leave your comment below and join the debate!

PS: Now that you’ve reached the end of the text and exercised your brain with so much theory, how about dropping by our store to make sure your equipment is as sharp as your tactical mind? There’s no point having a Ma Long rating if your rubber is slicker than a bar of soap! 🏓🔥

Visit the 360TT store

Who Is the GOAT of Table Tennis? 100 Years of History and Magic

Mon, 27 Apr 2026 20:02:00 -0300

The ITTF has just released an epic documentary (video above) celebrating the centenary of our sport (1926-2026). It is 40 minutes of pure history, but since the video is in English, I made a point of dissecting every detail to bring you what really matters. This is not just a retrospective; it is the story of the revolutions that shaped the racket you hold today.

TL;DR: the ITTF documentary tells how the game was born in British basements, was turned upside down by Hiroji Sato’s sponge, saw the Swedish miracle and the Chinese symphony, and ends with Hugo Calderano’s 2025 World Cup. At the end, the coach picks his GOATs: Deng Yaping, Waldner and Ma Long.

Tip

The video is in English. While watching, turn on the automatically generated captions in English and, if you want, set up the automatic translation into your own language, so you can follow along with subtitles you read easily.

The beginning: when rackets were corks

Did you know that table tennis started out as Whiff-Waff in British clubs? In the late 19th century, it was an elite after-dinner pastime. It was only in 1926 that the ITTF was founded in London. Back then, Hungary dominated everything. The legendary Victor Barna, with his surreal 41 medals at world championships, was the face of the sport.

The game changed its name, its table and its rules, but its competitive essence was born in London basements and conquered the planet.

The sponge revolution and the end of “Marty Supreme”

The documentary highlights a painful break in 1952. Until then, the American Marty Reisman, “Marty Supreme”, was the king of hardbat. Everything changed when the Japanese player Hiroji Sato showed up with a thick, soft sponge. Sato didn’t make the classic sound of impact; the ball came out silent, but with a spin and speed that Reisman couldn’t read. It was the beginning of modern table tennis.

Sweden: the miracle and the Glenn Östh orchestra

Many say that Jan-Ove Waldner faced China alone, but the documentary and history prove he was the sun of a flawless constellation. Under the strategic command of Glenn Östh, Sweden built the greatest challenge the “Wall” has ever faced:

Jan-Ove Waldner (the Mozart): the first man to complete the Grand Slam. He won Olympic gold in Barcelona (1992) and was a two-time singles world champion (1989 and 1997). The video highlights his absurd feat in Manchester in 1997, where he was world champion without losing a single set, 21 to 0 overall.
Jörgen Persson: the pillar of consistency. Singles world champion in Chiba (1991), Persson was Waldner’s ideal partner, reaching historic finals and keeping Sweden on top for almost two decades.
Mikael Appelgren: the master of control and counter-attack. He was a three-time European singles champion and a world doubles champion. His left hand was the Chinese players’ nightmare, and it was fundamental in the team victories.
Team dominance: Sweden didn’t just win, it dominated. There were four team world titles (1989, 1991, 1993 and the historic return in 2000). The documentary reverently recalls the 5-0 over China in the Dortmund final in 1989, a score that shocked the planet.

Names like Erik Lind and Peter Karlsson rounded out this team of legends, proving that the Swedish miracle was, above all, a triumph of teamwork and tactical intelligence.

China: the unbroken symphony

Since 1996, China has won almost 90% of all world titles available. The documentary details how this hegemony was built through legends who shaped the modern game:

The women’s dynasty: the video pays tribute to the era of Deng Yaping (the first great sovereign), followed by Wang Nan and the “invincible” Zhang Yining, who retired at the peak as Olympic and world champion.
The tactical architects: the transition to modern table tennis went through the hands of Liu Guoliang (master of the short pips and of the serve) and Kong Linghui, the first to unify the major titles.
The golden trio: the documentary highlights the era of Wang Liqin (the giant of physical power), Ma Lin (the master of touch and of the classic penhold style) and Wang Hao, the man who revolutionized the reverse penhold backhand (RPB) and was the direct mentor of the next generation.
The modern phenomena: you can’t talk about history without mentioning Zhang Jike, the “mad dog”, who holds the record for the fastest Grand Slam in history (445 days), and his immediate successor Fan Zhendong, who consolidated his greatness by inheriting the world throne with impeccable technique.
The captain: and, at the center of it all, Ma Long. The video crowns him as the only man to win the double Grand Slam, defining what it means to be perfection on two legs.

The video points out that the Austrian Werner Schlager, in 2003, was the last non-Chinese player to win the men’s singles world title, a reminder of how relentless the Chinese training system is.

Brazil: Hugo Calderano and the future

The climax for us Brazilians is seeing the spotlight given to Hugo Calderano. The documentary celebrates Hugo as the great force that changed the balance of the sport in the WTT era.

Hugo’s title at the 2025 World Cup is cited as the milestone when the world realized that Chinese hegemony has real cracks. Brazil is no longer just a participant; we are protagonists in the ITTF’s hundred-year history.

The verdict from the coach: who is your GOAT?

Note

GOAT is an acronym for “Greatest of All Time”.

After 100 years of evolution, who are the greatest of all time? Here is my pick:

🏆 Women: for me, it’s Deng Yaping. Her aggressiveness and mindset were from another planet. She didn’t just win; she dominated her opponents’ souls.
🌍 Men (Earth): Jan-Ove Waldner was the greatest of all time on Planet Earth. His creativity and his “feeling” were human, yet brilliant.
🌌 Men (Galaxy): Ma Long… well, Ma Long is the greatest of all time in the Galaxy. That guy is not human. He is an efficiency machine built by aliens.

The video mentioned Victor Barna, Angelica Rozeanu, Waldner, Deng Yaping, Ma Long, Hugo Calderano and so many others. Who gets the GOAT title for you? Is there any other name the video forgot?

Now I want to hear from you: who is your GOAT? Leave your comment below, let’s debate these 100 years of passion!